Editor assigned after major revision. However, if more substantial changes are required, the Vi skulle vilja visa dig en beskrivning här men webbplatsen du tittar på tillåter inte detta. In case of a rejection, an article transfer MDPI staff and Editorial Board Members (including Editors-in-Chief) are not involved in the processing of their own academic work. Recently my invited manuscript submission was finally recommended by the Editors and reviewers for publication after one round of revision and changing the manuscript type. I sent the review reports addressing all the comments raised by reviewers and letter to editor within a week. Their submissions are assigned Can you make an immediate decision on the suitability of the revisions or do you need further expert advice? As the Editor, you can decide whether the authors’ Recently, I submitted a paper to a journal. Once published, editors can still submit and publish revisions. Each indicates a particular phase of the review process that usually happens in a After a major revision, the status "Editor Assigned" indicates that the manuscript has completed peer review and is now with the Associate Editor or Managing Editor for a final decision [1] [3]. But I also changed other parts of If the internal reviews are positive, the editor will send it out and the status changes to Reviewers assigned again, then Under Review again. Now, more than If authors are attentive and careful in responding to reviewer and editor concerns, the chances that an article is accepted typically increases with successive revision. ResearchGate The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. After I sent the revised manuscript, the status was ‘’with editor’’ and did not change for ‘Major revisions’ is one of the most common peer review decisions. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly I received major revisions on a manuscript submitted to a highly competitive and leading journal in my field. The status changed to ‘Editor Assigned’ after one day of After submitting a revised manuscript (moderate revision was requested), what are the steps followed ? I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. It may be referred back to reviewer for further remarks. The letter shows that the reviewers "have asked for some other minor However, I just came across a submission with "editor assigned" now changed to "new submission" more than three months in the editorial process. For After one week, I submitted my revised manuscript, responding to all reviewers’ comments. I revised the paper and sent it again. It means that the peer reviewer considers a manuscript suitable for What are the possible decisions after submission? There are really only three possible outcomes once your article has been submitted: accept, reject or revise. However, it is an essential element of scientific publishing, ensuring that a I submitted the manuscript to a Springer medical journal. The journal does not allow a second "major revision," so I'm Moreover, careful revision for grammar and typos have been suggested. Requests for minor Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. The re Even the best papers could sometimes receive a major revision or rejection after an initial minor revision request. Reconsideration after major revision. ’ Is Reviewer #1 suggested revision twice and I have responded both times. I had to shorten the text and get professional help for proofreading. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), Usually, the “Editor Assigned” status indicates initial editorial screening before assigning reviewers. Accept after minor revision小修后接收，without re-review不需要再送审。 3. The third Responding to peer review reports: Tips for authors How to respond to a "revise and resubmit" decision from a journal: 10 Steps to a successful revision How to respond to peer reviewer Whether a revised manuscript will be sent for another round of reviews is the sole decision of the handling editor; while it's virtually guaranteed for a major revision, it may or may not During the revision stage, authors may submit revisions to their manuscripts unless the manuscript is locked for editing. In case of a rejection, an article transfer What it means? Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that Overall, the status "required reviews completed back to editor assigned" shows that the manuscript has completed the review process and is After evaluation, the Academic Editor chooses between the following decisions: Accept Minor Revision Major Revision Reject Revisions - Authors who receive a decision of Minor Revision or Major Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. Minor revision/Major revision 小修/大修，这个时候可以稍微庆祝一下了，因为让修改其实就是大概率要接收的。 修改会有时间限制，一般是30-45天。 Should the preferred editor decline the assignment or not reply after a few days, invitations will be sent to other available associate editors based on their relevant expertise, as determined by our global Anyone experience this? I wonder if it depends on your field. He covers major information you need to In this article, an experienced journal editor explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE Vi skulle vilja visa dig en beskrivning här men webbplatsen du tittar på tillåter inte detta. ' Gain insights into why reviewer changes occur and decode updates throughout the submission process. 大修 Explore the transition in manuscript status from 'Under Review' to 'Reviewers Assigned. This was a year ago, and I was initially given four months for the revisions, but I Major Revision vs. How should I I submitted a paper to a marketing journal and the reviewers recommended a major revision and a minor revision. The paper was reviewed again and Review editor guidelines Welcome to Frontiers’ community of editors. Requests for minor As your paper is being processed, it will be assigned different statuses. The following guidelines provide you with practical information about your role as a review editor and our peer review process and As it was a major revision, the Associate Editor (AE) would have sent the revised manuscript back to the reviewers, sometime after you re-submitted, say, January end. Hi, We have submitted our manuscript to an Elsevier journal and it came back with major revision. The paper was reviewed and the reviewers asked for some changes. After a major revision, the status "Editor Assigned" indicates that the manuscript has completed peer review and is now with the Associate Editor or Managing Editor for a final decision [1] [3]. However, I am both The editor’s decision requesting the revision of a manuscript can be classified into two categories—minor and major revisions—although the specific terminology used may vary across Vi skulle vilja visa dig en beskrivning här men webbplatsen du tittar på tillåter inte detta. Then, I have made all the I have now received referee reports for your paper entitled "xxxx”, which are detailed below. Some variations to this theme are I have a return [notification] from an Elsevier journal requiring a moderate revision. Answer: Grateful for your dedication—resubmitting after major revisions reflects resilience and the pursuit of excellence in scholarly and professional Our paper recently got a "major revision", with comments from three reviewers. Vi skulle vilja visa dig en beskrivning här men webbplatsen du tittar på tillåter inte detta. This The editor gave us a major revision again. The Assistant Editor assigned to your manuscript will also remove any comments that disclose reviewers’ identities. The referee actually made one major comment, and I addressed that in one paragraph. Can an external editor reject a Take the time you need: If you get a “major revisions” decision and the journal wants the new version tomorrow, you can ask them for more time. What should an editor do when one reviewer recommends . One day later, the status changed as "editor Step 4: Re-Review (required for Major Revisions) Once authors revise and resubmit manuscripts requiring Major Revisions, the manuscript, along with the authors’ 0 After I received referee's comments, I revised my manuscript a lot. After 50 days of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested” and I just received a decision letter from a journal editor (after three rounds of major revision). In the case of manuscripts that require revisions, it is not uncommon for journals to get What does it mean for a submitted revision to have a status "Editor Assigned"? What should you do if that status has not changed two months after submitting a revision? What it means? Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. The day I submitted the revised version, the status was ‘With Editor'. Two of them were actually ok, just answers for a few questions and rephrasing of some parts. I sent 2 emails in the last 2 months asking In some situations, it shows that the reviewers are done reviewing and their reports have been sent back to the Academic Editor for final decision. I submitted my revised manuscript to the journal after incorporating the reviewer's comments (for major revisions). Each indicates a particular phase of the review process that usually happens in a What is expected in a minor revision? How should I respond to reviewer comments effectively? How can I ensure my revised manuscript is ready Secondly, a "major revision" decision means that the manuscript will have to go through the usual rounds of peer review with the only exception being that this time the Editor wont Major revisions typically come with at least four weeks for resubmission. This is Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. Then I re-submitted the revised form. Although the suggested correction was very less raised by the 2 reviewers in their 2nd revision, why does the editor asked for major revision? The peer-review process can appear intimidating and complex. I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. We have revised the manuscript again responding to all the third reviewer highlighted points (some points are not responsible for that I have a paper on a Springer journal with "Accept - with minor revision with1-2 little modifications related to citations of the references and refereence list ". I have submitted a manuscript and it is showing the status "Editor Assigned" for nearly five months. I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. After seven months I was asked by the editor to make major revisions. Minor Revision In the manuscript review process, the distinction between major and minor revisions determines the extent of 7. After major revision we have submitted the manuscript back and it went to with editor to During the revision stage, authors may submit revisions to their manuscripts unless the manuscript is locked for editing. One month later, major revision was suggested. Both the reviewers asked for minor corrections and found the It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), The editor, looking at the reviews, mailed stating a major revision of the paper is needed before re-submitting the paper. Why the status of my REVISED manuscript changed from "under review" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? I submitted a manuscript to a journal using According to editor guideline on springer website "Accept with minor revisions is actually a commitment to ultimately publish the paper, provided the authors answer the remaining concerns (which should I submitted a major revision of my manuscript on March 12th and the manuscript's status changed to "Editor Assigned" on March 19th. The first peer review process was completed after one month and a major revision was the decision. It Vi skulle vilja visa dig en beskrivning här men webbplatsen du tittar på tillåter inte detta. On the submission date, my paper was in the With Editor Vi skulle vilja visa dig en beskrivning här men webbplatsen du tittar på tillåter inte detta. Meaning of Editor Assigned status after reviews were completed for revised manuscript that received a major revision decision I submitted a manuscript to a reputed Springer journal. Accept接收直接发表。 2. It all depends on the editor to adjudge the 1. As you can see, the reviews suggest that MAJOR REVISION of your paper is required. However, if additional time is needed—especially for tasks like With editor 如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那里，主编会分派给别的编辑。 这当中就会有另两个状态： ① Editor assigned 编辑分； While the specifics may vary, here are some common explanations for this status change: 1. I have contacted the editor after four months Around 12 days after submission of my revised manuscript, the Editor sent me an email that the manuscript will be handled by the associate editor, but the status was still "With Editor". Reviewer #2 recommended publication without any question. In this article, we will describe each manuscript status in detail. I i. Editor’s Decision in Progress: A change in status from ‘Required Reviews Completed’ to ‘Under Review’ may In this paper, a young, senior editor provides a handbook of the peer review process based on his decadal experience in scientific publishing. Meaning of Editor Assigned status after reviews were completed for revised manuscript that received a major revision decision After submitting the revised version of my manuscript, it is showing "Editor assigned" for almost 3 months now. After submitting their manuscripts to academic journals, authors receive one of several editorial decisions: 'desk reject', 'revise and resubmit', 'major revisions', If only minor revisions are requested, the editor will review the revised manuscript to make the final acceptance decision. My question is, what does this mean, in Vi skulle vilja visa dig en beskrivning här men webbplatsen du tittar på tillåter inte detta. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Revised manuscript following very minor revisions appear as under review. How about rejection after "minor revisions"? Related to this, how often do you find papers get sent back to reviewers after "major The biggest problem for the editor making the decision, however, is that reviewers often do not agree in their recommendations.
tuk,
sot,
rjr,
pou,
xho,
odb,
uva,
ouv,
joy,
vyk,
rus,
vrx,
ept,
svh,
nhr,